Comparison of Early Decision/Early Action Rates vs. Regular Decision

HomeApplyComparison of Early Decision/Early Action Rates vs. Regular DecisionThis page may contain affiliate links.Sep 10, 2017  Theres a belief among students and families that the odds of being accepted to a  college are better if students apply early decision vs. regular decision. Let the numbers speak for themselves and download our most up to date information showing early decision/early action results compared to regular decision. In some cases the odds of being accepted are dramatically different if you apply early vs. regular admissions, but remember applying early decision is a binding agreement between a student and the college. #mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; } /* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block. We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */    Early Decision Stats Every Applicant Should See Receive our report comparing early vs. regular decision admissions rates. * indicates required Email Address * Are You A Parent, Student, or Professional? * ParentStudentAdmissions Professional Year of High School Graduation * 20182019202020212022 (function($) {window.fnames = new Array(); window.ftypes = new Array();fnames[0]='EMAIL';ftypes[0]='email';fnames[1]='MMERGE1';ftypes[1]='dropdown';fnames[4]='MMERGE4';ftypes[4]='dropdown';}(jQuery));var $mcj = jQuery.noConflict(true); Some interesting insights from the data: Schools with restricted early action plans had the lowest early admission rates, ranging form 9% to 17%.   (Restrictive Early Action (REA)  is a non-binding  early  application option for students interested in applying to Stanford,  Boston College,  Harvard,Princeton, Notre Dame and  Yale. Students applying REA may not apply to any college or university in their binding  Early  Decision program. REA admission decisions are released by December 15, and admitted students have until May 1 to respond to their offer.) Colleges that use some form of early admissions practices tend to fill a large percentage of their freshman class through early admissions. 26 colleges on this list fill 50% or more of their freshman class through early decision/action admissions, while 55 colleges on the list fill 40% or more of their freshman class. What has become more popular among these colleges is the use of multiple early decision deadlines known as early decision I (ED I) and early decision II (ED II). 40 of these schools have 2 early decision dates.   A students chances of being admitted are better applying early decision. 44 colleges have an early decision admission rate that is double or more their regular decision rate. This would imply that a student has a better chance of being admitted if they apply early. The information we dont have to better clarify this insight is information about test scores and GPA for students admitted early decision and if there is a bias of students with better academic requirements applying early. But if your academic profile (test scores and GPA) is better than the 50% percentile, you probably have a better chance of being admitted if you apply early. For example, some schools give a very large advantage during early decision (ED vs. RD): Claremont McKenna College: 32% ED to 7% RD American University: 85% ED to 23% RD Middlebury College: 43% ED to 13% RD University of Pennsylvania: 23% ED to 7% RD Find our more about the difference between early action and early decision. Do your research and understand college costs before applying early decision. Ask yourself and your student these questions before committing to applying early decision (as recommended by independent college counselor Wendy Bolen Andreen): For students: Why do you want to apply early? Does the school feel like an academic, cultural, and geographic fit? Are there activities, choices of majors, opportunities for internships and research that interest you? Are you 110% sure this is the school that meets your academic needs? For parents: Will merit scholarships be a deciding factor on where you can afford to send your student? Are you prepared to pay the full sticker price, if you dont receive enough aid? Early decision  is a binding decision and should be honored as such. High school guidance counselors and independent college counselors dont support the idea that a student can pull out of early decision once they have been admitted, just because the financial aid package doesnt fit a familys needs.  Resources, like a colleges Net Price Calculator, are available to help a family get a close idea of how much a college will potentially cost before their student applies. (A link to each colleges NPC is included in our download). Find out more about Net Price Calculators. SaveSave SaveSave Road2College Debbie Schwartz is former financial services executive and founder of Road2College and the Paying For College 101 Facebook group. She's dedicated to providing families with trustworthy information about college admissions and paying for college. With data, tools and access to experts she's helping families become educated consumers of higher ed. View all posts CATEGORIES Apply TAGS Acceptance RatesEarly ActionEarly DecisionNEWER POSTThinking About How To Pay For College? You Must See This EFC Chart!OLDER POSTA Clever Way Parents Can Save Money With Amazon Prime Student Membership

The Extreme Expansion Of The Meat Industry - 1317 Words

Today the industries are now dominated by a handful of huge corporations that process most of the country’s meat at several facilities across the country. As of 2007, four huge companies controlled the processing of over 80% of the country’s beef and three of these same companies process over 60% of the country’s pork. Chicken processing provides over half the country’s chicken supply and even the same situation exists for turkey meat. These four major companies are Tyson, JBS, Cargill, and Smithfield Foods. As a result of all, meatpacking companies have become increasingly powerful, while the government bodies that regulate them have done barely anything to keep them in line. The extreme expansion of the meat industry has accompanied the†¦show more content†¦We do not want another family to have to suffer as our family did.† Other diseases like Salmonella and Campylobacter can also be introduced. In addition to these food safety risks, the use of hazardous machinery and sharp knives can injure workers when mistakes are made. This danger is exacerbated by the increasingly rapid speeds at which workers are expected to slaughter and process animals. This can also cause AIDS and HIV when they come in contact with our foods, if workers get injured while processing meats. The Federal health authorities have estimated that foodborne diseases affect 1 in 6 Americans, which is over 48 million people. These diseases cause 128,000 hospitalizations and kill 3,000 Americans every year. Likewise, a number of studies have confirmed the presence of harmful bacteria in meat, in the US. (put in examples) (each of the sections at least one time but you can do more) (in text citations) These levels are unacceptable; the high levels of contamination are caused by the crowded conditions in which conventional food animals are raised, as well as the high speed at which meat is processed. In order to lower profits, meat processors have continually increased the speed of their production lines. Twenty years ago, meatpacking plants slaughtered about 175 cattle an hour, but due to increased line speeds, today plants can slaughter as many as 400 cattle per hour. In order to ensure the

Should Felons Be Restored The Right - 1735 Words

Although felons are a criminal who have committed a dangerous crime by rebelling against the law and have been punished by politics and government of the United States the right not to vote; as a result they were denied of voting right. However, taking away the right to vote is like appealing against the constitution of the fourteen amendments which state that every person have the right to be free from discrimination and to have the equal of the law. Therefore, felons should be given the right to vote when he or she bore an American citizen or naturalized as an American citizen; as a result no one should be denied the right from voting not when you are a citizen and have served their sentences. Felons should be restored the right to vote because the fourteen Amendment states all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. Therefore, no persons should be denied within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. However, restoring felons the right to vote will help improve the voting rate in America to increase. During the present election it claims that voting rate decrease because citizen did not vote when they are permitted the right to vote. Recent headline called Pew Research Center report claims that the voting rate got a decrease because citizen didn’t vote because he or she realizes their votes will not be checked. Second, they were busy with family issues at home, work/schoolShow MoreRelatedThe Argument For Voting Rights873 Words   |  4 Pagesand reintegration, ex-felons become part of a law-abiding society with the same privileges as others in the society, proponents for vo ting rights argue.† If they go through these things to become a part of society again, then why are they not allowed the right to vote? This must be an upsetting process for those felons that want to become a part of society again and actually care to make a difference. All that they want to do is to be granted one of the basic fundamental rights guaranteed to citizensRead MoreShould Convicted Felons Have The Right Of Vote?1291 Words   |  6 Pages Should convicted felons have the right to vote? How would you feel if one mistake caused one of your main rights as citizens to be taken away? Today, people who have paid their dues are denied their innate right to vote and to participate in decisions that governs their lives. Convicted felons who served their time have an innate right to vote and failure to allow ex-felons to vote has a disproportionate impact on my minority communities. Having the right to vote is a part ofRead More Convicted Felons Should Retain The Right to Vote Essay1613 Words   |  7 PagesIndividuals convicted of a felony should not lose their right to vote. The right to vote is a birth right for citizens born in this country. This right is taken for granted by many and is exercised by far too few. As the United States prepares for its 57th presidential election over five million of its citizens will be denied their right to participate in the electoral process. Why would such a large number of people be denied a constitutional right? They have been excluded from votingRead MoreThe Time Of Ancient Greeks And Romans1151 Words   |  5 Pagesdisenfranchisement for felons began throughout Europe and was referred to as the civil death. Disenfranchisement means to prevent from someone or an individual the right to vote do to their criminal history in the past with this happening in The United States it doesn’t give the opportunity of ex-felons to have input on any laws that being passed. For many centuries criminals lost he many rights including their right to enter into contracts, there right to own fire arms, the right to employment in certainRead MoreRestricting the Voting Rights of Felons1491 Words   |  6 Pageslike Hiser who are refused the right to vote. Republican state legislators continue to withhold this fundamental right of democracy from felons who have rejoined society as abiding citizens. Consequently, restricting the voting rights of felons has reflected a negative impact on society and civil rights as this partisan law; disproportionately affects minorities and men, while it also contradicts the fifteenth amendment, and limits the complete reintegration of felons in society; therefore the millionsRead MoreShould Felons Be Allowed to Vote? Essay794 Words   |  4 PagesShould Felons be Allowed to Vote? About 5.26 million people with a felony conviction are not allowed to vote in elections. Each state has its own laws on disenfranchisement. Nine states in America permanently restrict felons from voting while Vermont and Maine allow felons to vote while in prison. Proponents of felon re-enfranchisement believe felons who have paid their debt to society by completing their sentences should have all of their rights and privileges restored. They argue that effortsRead MoreFelons and Gun Control3277 Words   |  14 PagesCapstone Not All Convicted Felons Should Lose Their Right to Vote or Possess a Firearm Reed Flierl A felony is a conviction of a crime punishable in the United States by imprisonment of more than a year. Once you are convicted of a felony you lose certain rights, regardless of whether it’s a violent crime such as, murder, or if you were convicted of a non-violent crime such as, felony possession. The loss of certain citizenship rights, due to criminal activity, goes back asRead MoreEssay about Felon Disenfranchisement1043 Words   |  5 PagesThe root of Felon Disenfranchisement can be traced back to Greek and Roman laws. Where any person convicted of an infamous crime would lose his or her right to participate in polis. In Rome they would lose their right to participate in suffrage and to serve in the Roman legions. With the founding of the United States of America, the US Constitution gave the right to establish voting laws to the states. From 1776 - 1821 eleven states included felony disenfranchisement in their laws (Voter RegistrationRead MoreFelons Deserve Their Righ ts Back1298 Words   |  6 PagesFelons Deserve Their Rights Back Every individual deserves the right to vote despite color or gender even if they are a convicted felon. This country was founded off of freedom from declaring itself independent. Even though individuals have committed certain crimes they should at least have a way to earn their freedom back in some type of way. The first step in this process would be making it automatic in every state ,after the process of rehabilitation felons should have their rights reinstatedRead MoreA False Democracy : The Presidential Election1434 Words   |  6 Pagesconvicted felons’ votes are stolen by the government because of their criminal behavior. Each of the fifty states in the U.S. recognize numerous specific and confusing laws on whether or not felons deserve the right to vote after they complete their sentences, which leads to one fifth of all criminals losing their voting privileges once incarcerated. Despite the severity of disenfranchisement, the federal government has yet to release any national regulations clarifying this injustice. Felons should be

How the Indian Removal Act Was Unjust free essay sample

It is mainly unconstitutional due to that fact of Americas Manifest Destiny. As Americans greed for more land, Indians are pushed further and further west. This desire for Indian lands was also abetted by the Indian hating mentality that was peculiar to some American frontiersman. I The Indian Removal itself is unconstitutional due to that fact that Indians were never truly considered Americans or settlers. They had seeded help from the newly appointed president Andrew Jackson but he would not interfere with the lawful prerogatives of the state of Georgia.Indian Removal was designed to push Native Americans fiftieth tribal lands. Indian Removal catered to the demands of white settlers who wanted to take over desirable tribal lands such as the fertile farmlands controlled by Native American nations in the American southeast. And while the act was theoretically voluntary, many Native Americans were coerced, forced, and manipulated into giving up their land. We will write a custom essay sample on How the Indian Removal Act Was Unjust or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The primary target of the Indian Removal Act were the so-called five civilized tribes, the Cherokee, Muscovite, Choctaw, Seminole, and Chickasaws, who controlled huge swaths of land in areas like Florida and Georgia.These tribes had tried a variety of tactics to hold on to their land, including assimilating and adopting European habits, which is why they were known as civilized. Some tribes did voluntary give up their lands under the Indian Removal Act, only to find that when they relocated to the west, the land they received in exchange was of poor quality, and was not comparable to the rich, fertile land they had been living on for centuries. Other tribes were subjected to coercion and manipulation by government officials who forced them to give up their land. Tens of thousands of Native Americans, most notably members of theCherokee Nation, were forcibly removed and marched to regions like Oklahoma in the Trail of Tears in the asses, and many died along the way. Under the Indian Removal Act and similar laws, numerous Native American nations were stripped of their land, heritage, and culture. In the 20th century, the government recognized that considerable harm had occurred as a result of policies like Indian Removal, and some attempts were made to protect Native American nations and their history, although it would have been impossible to repair the damage done in previous centuries.